Dr. Andrade's Commentary in J Clin Psych: A Scholarly Defense of ECT
Out on PubMed, from noted ECT scholar, C. Andrade, is this commentary: Active Placebo, the Parachute Meta-Analysis, the Nobel Prize, and the Efficacy of Electroconvulsive Therapy. Andrade C. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;82(2):21f13992. doi: 10.4088/JCP.21f13992. PMID: 34000105 The abstract is copied below: The efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been recently questioned on the grounds that placebo-controlled (sham ECT) trials are all old and of poor quality; statements have been made that the prescription of ECT should immediately be suspended because its continued use cannot be scientifically justified. These criticisms have come from academicians and have been presented in scientific and news forums with wide readership. A rebuttal is therefore necessary, if only to counter the formation of negative attitudes among patients, health care professionals, and the general public. The quality of sham ECT randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is undoubtedly poor; however, t...