Outcomes of Youth Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Utah

 Out on Pubmed is this article from clinicians in Utah:

Outcomes of Youth Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pierson MD, Mickey BJ, Gilley LB, Weeks HR.J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 23;82(2):19m13164. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m13164.PMID: 33988931

The abstract is copied below:

Background: The use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in children and adolescents is based on a limited evidence base in the medical literature. We report outcomes of a cohort of youth treated with ECT at a single US academic medical center.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review and analysis of all patients aged 18 years and younger who received ECT at the University of Utah from 1985 through 2016. For each patient record, 3 short-term clinical outcomes were assessed: response on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, number of treatments administered, and reported side effects. Baseline characteristics were tested as predictors of clinical outcomes.

Results: One hundred seven youth (aged 10-18 years, 46% female) received ECT for a mood disorder, psychotic disorder, catatonia, or neuroleptic malignant syndrome. The most common diagnoses (DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5) were major depressive disorder (76 patients) and bipolar disorder (23 patients). The rate of response (much improved or very much improved) for the entire cohort was 77%. The mean number of treatments administered was 10.5. The most commonly reported side effects were headache (75%) and memory problems (65%). One patient experienced tardive seizures. There were no deaths or serious injuries. Clinical response was not predicted by age, sex, or clinical features (all P > .05).

Conclusions: These data suggest that ECT is a safe and effective treatment for children and adolescents with certain severe psychiatric illnesses. ECT outcomes and side effects were similar to those reported in adults, particularly for patients aged 15-18 years, for whom there are the most data.





And from the text:



This very well presented and well written retrospective chart review adds a substantial cohort (n=107) to the evidence base for the efficacy and safety of ECT in children and adolescents. Note that 3 children treated for self-injurious behavior in autism were excluded from this analysis. The remarkable response rates speak for themselves, in patients who were obviously severely ill and likely very "treatment resistant."
When teenagers present with severe forms of mood and psychotic disorders, it is clear that ECT needs to considered a standard treatment option. 
These authors from the University of Utah deserve kudos for their very helpful addition to the ECT literature; worth a careful, full read (~15minutes).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

Image
Out on PubMed, from investigators in the US, is this study: Ketamine versus  ECT   for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, Murrough JW, Goes FS, Altinay M, Aloysi AS, Asghar-Ali AA, Barnett BS, Chang LC, Collins KA, Costi S, Iqbal S, Jha MK, Krishnan K, Malone DA, Nikayin S, Nissen SE, Ostroff RB, Reti IM, Wilkinson ST, Wolski K, Hu B. N Engl J Med. 2023 May 24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302399. Online ahead of print. PMID:  37224232 The abstract is copied below: Background:  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain. Methods:  We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression . Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 rat
Read more

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

Image
Out on PubMed, from the team in Augusta, Georgia, is this study: Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST). Youssef NA, McCall WV, Ravilla D, McCloud L, Rosenquist PB. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):E979. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120979. PMID:  33322138 The pdf is here . And from the Introduction : In theory, LAP-ST can be helpful because of the direct effect of lower electric current, but the principal reason is that LAP-ST has a more focal electric field (EF) [ 34 , 35 ]. The current amplitude is the primary factor that drives the EF into brain regions located deeper in the brain and is responsible for cognition and memory such as the hippocampus and temporal lobe [ 33 , 35 ]. This extra focality of the EF can minimize or avoid high EF stimulation to the deeper hippocampal and temporal lobe regions [ 33 , 35 ]. Minimization of deeper stimulation by using LAP
Read more

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT

Image
 Out on PubMed, from authors at Vanderbilt and Mass General,, is this article: Use of   ECT   for Children With and Without Catatonia: A Single-Site Retrospective Analysis. Smith JR, Baldwin I, Termini KA, McGonigle T, Vandekar S, Luccarelli J. J ECT. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000993. Online ahead of print. PMID:  38265759 The abstract is copied below: Objectives: The objective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients. Methods: A single-site retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years who received ECT in a private university hospital from January 28, 2012 to April 8, 2023. Treatment efficacy and adverse events were determined retrospectively through review of the medical record. Results: A total of 36 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Catatonia was the most common presenting indication for ECT, followed by psychosis and suicidal ideation.
Read more