Out on PubMed is this study from investigators in the Netherlands:
Psychotic depressive subtype and white mater hyperintensities do not predict cognitive side effects in ECT: A systematic review of pretreatment predictors.
van Kessel MA, van der Vlugt JJB, Spaans HP, Murre JMJ, Verwijk E.J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:340-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.181. Epub 2020 May 4.PMID: 32553376 Review.
The abstract is at the above link, and copied here:
Background: Most studies regarding cognitive side-effects following ECT for treating depression report transient forms of cognitive disturbances. However, a growing number of studies also report considerable differences among individual patients.
Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify pretreatment patient characteristics for predicting the risk of developing cognitive side-effects following ECT.
Methods: Online databases PubMed/Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for articles published from 2002 through May 2019, using the following relevant search terms: #cognitive deficits AND #Electro Convulsive Therapy. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied for full-text inclusion. PRISMA guidelines were used.
Results: Our initial search yielded 2155 publications; 16 studies were included. A total of 16 possible predictive factors were identified. Two factors, psychotic features and white matter hyperintensities, were conclusively found to not predict cognitive side-effects following ECT; the remaining 14 factors were inconclusive.
Conclusions: There is robust evidence that psychotic features and white matter hyperintensities are not predictive of cognitive side-effects following ECT. None of the other 14 factors examined were predictive, however these levels of evidence were weak and therefore inconclusive. Additional studies focusing primarily on pretreatment patient characteristics for predicting cognitive side-effects following ECT are needed, including demographic, clinical, physiological, neurobiological, and genetic factors. Finally, we provide suggestions for future research.
This is a carefully done, and complicated, literature review looking at predictors of cognitive effects of ECT. The results are negative for 2 of the 14 factors (psychotic features and white matter hyper intensities) and inconclusive for the other 12. The overall conclusions are: 1) that there is large individual patient variability in the acute tolerability of ECT, and 2) that we need further investigation to get closer to the goal of personalized medicine in ECT, with ability to more accurately predict response and tolerability for each patient.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

Image
Out on PubMed, from investigators in the US, is this study: Ketamine versus  ECT   for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, Murrough JW, Goes FS, Altinay M, Aloysi AS, Asghar-Ali AA, Barnett BS, Chang LC, Collins KA, Costi S, Iqbal S, Jha MK, Krishnan K, Malone DA, Nikayin S, Nissen SE, Ostroff RB, Reti IM, Wilkinson ST, Wolski K, Hu B. N Engl J Med. 2023 May 24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302399. Online ahead of print. PMID:  37224232 The abstract is copied below: Background:  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain. Methods:  We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression . Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 rat
Read more

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

Image
Out on PubMed, from the team in Augusta, Georgia, is this study: Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST). Youssef NA, McCall WV, Ravilla D, McCloud L, Rosenquist PB. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):E979. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120979. PMID:  33322138 The pdf is here . And from the Introduction : In theory, LAP-ST can be helpful because of the direct effect of lower electric current, but the principal reason is that LAP-ST has a more focal electric field (EF) [ 34 , 35 ]. The current amplitude is the primary factor that drives the EF into brain regions located deeper in the brain and is responsible for cognition and memory such as the hippocampus and temporal lobe [ 33 , 35 ]. This extra focality of the EF can minimize or avoid high EF stimulation to the deeper hippocampal and temporal lobe regions [ 33 , 35 ]. Minimization of deeper stimulation by using LAP
Read more

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT

Image
 Out on PubMed, from authors at Vanderbilt and Mass General,, is this article: Use of   ECT   for Children With and Without Catatonia: A Single-Site Retrospective Analysis. Smith JR, Baldwin I, Termini KA, McGonigle T, Vandekar S, Luccarelli J. J ECT. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000993. Online ahead of print. PMID:  38265759 The abstract is copied below: Objectives: The objective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients. Methods: A single-site retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years who received ECT in a private university hospital from January 28, 2012 to April 8, 2023. Treatment efficacy and adverse events were determined retrospectively through review of the medical record. Results: A total of 36 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Catatonia was the most common presenting indication for ECT, followed by psychosis and suicidal ideation.
Read more