Postictal Agitation in ECT: Retrospective Study From Korea

Out on PubMed, from researchers in Korea, is this study:


Factors associated with post-electroconvulsive therapy delirium: A retrospective chart review study.

Jo YT, Joo SW, Lee J, Joo YH.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 9;100(14):e24508. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024508.PMID: 33832062
The abstract is copied below:
Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is generally a safe therapeutic method, unexpected adverse effects, such as post-ECT delirium, may occur. Despite its harmful consequences, there has been little discussion about the predictors of post-ECT delirium. Thus, the current study aimed to clarify the factors associated with post-ECT delirium by reviewing electronic medical records of 268 bitemporal ECT sessions from December 2006 to July 2018 in a university hospital.Demographic and clinical characteristics of sessions involving patients with or without post-ECT delirium were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to analyze the correlation between variables and post-ECT delirium.Post-ECT delirium developed in 23 sessions (8.6%). Of all the demographic and clinical variables measured, only etomidate use was significantly different between delirium-positive and delirium-negative groups after Bonferroni correction. The regression model also indicated that etomidate use to be significantly associated with post-ECT delirium.In this study, etomidate was associated with a higher risk of developing post-ECT delirium, an association that appeared unrelated to other possible measured variables. Practitioners should take into account the risk of post-ECT delirium while choosing anesthetics, so as to prevent early discontinuation before sufficient therapeutic gain is achieved.

The pdf is here.

and a table:

This is a retrospective study with significant limitations and some idiosyncrasies; it looked at the development of delirium after ECT #1 in 268 sessions. If I am interpreting the table correctly, 6/15 patients (40%) who received etomidate developed delirium, compared with 16/241 (7%) for pentobarbital and 1/12 (8%) for propofol. This just seems hugely disproportionate, given the common use of etomidate in ECT. So, let's view these results with some skepticism.
Postictal agitation at treatment #1 is something the ECT team should always be prepared to manage; it is the reason that special care should be taken to securely tape in the IV at the first ECT session.
No real need to read this paper in full, IMO.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT