Electrode Placement, Pulse Width, Cognition and E-Field Modelling: New Study From Australia
Out on PubMed, from investigators in Australia, is this paper:
Effects of modifying the electrode placement and pulse width on cognitive side effects with unilateral ECT: A pilot randomised controlled study with computational modelling.
Brain Stimul. 2021 Oct 6;14(6):1489-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.09.014. Online ahead of print.PMID: 34626843
The abstract is copied below:
Background: The electrode placement and pulse width for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are important treatment parameters associated with ECT related retrograde memory side-effects. Modification of these parameters with right unilateral (RUL) ECT may have utility for further reducing these side-effects.
Objective: This study explored use of the frontoparietal (FP) placement for reducing retrograde memory side effects with ECT. We hypothesised that superior retrograde memory outcomes would occur with FP compared to temporoparietal (TP) placement and with ultrabrief (UB: 0.3 ms) compared to brief pulse (BP: 1.0 ms) width ECT.
Methods: In this randomised cross-over, double-blinded study, participants received a single treatment of BP TP, BP FP, UB TP and UB FP ECT. Neuropsychological testing was conducted prior to and immediately following each treatment. Computational modelling was conducted to explore associations between E-fields in regions-of-interest associated with memory.
Results: Nine participants completed the study. The FP placement was not superior to TP for retrograde memory outcomes. For both electrode placements UB pulse width was associated with significantly better visual retrograde memory compared to BP (p < .05). With TP ECT, higher E-fields in regions-of-interest were significantly associated with greater visual retrograde memory side-effects (hippocampi: r = -0.77, p = .04; inferior frontal gyri: r = -0.92, p < .01; middle frontal gyri: r = -0.84, p = .02).
Conclusions: Modification of pulse-width had greater effects than electrode placement for reducing retrograde memory side-effects with RUL ECT. Preliminary findings suggested that higher E-fields may be associated with greater cognitive side-effects with ECT.
Keywords: Computational modelling; Electroconvulsive therapy; Memory; Pulse width; Right unilateral.
The pdf is here.
And from the text:
has been minimally studied. This placement is similar to the widely
used D'Elia temporoparietal (TP) RUL placement, though has the
anterior electrode instead placed either supraorbitally [15] or
4-5 cm above the outer canthus of the eye along a vertical line
perpendicular to a line connecting the pupils [16].
This is a very complicated study in 9 patients, with limited positive findings. At first read of the title, I thought it was all computational modelling, not done in real patients. But it was both, including use of the experimental frontoparietal electrode placement. Pulse width had more effect on cognition than electrode placement, and higher E-fields were associated with greater cognitive effects in the modelling.
A full read is in order for students of cognition in ECT and followers of the E-field literature, ~20 minutes.
Comments
Post a Comment