Serum S100B Not Affected By ECT: New Study From Denmark

Out on PubMed, from researchers in Denmark, is this study:

Serum S100B protein after electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depression.

Gbyl K, Jørgensen NR, Videbech P.Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2022 Mar 7:1-23. doi: 10.1017/neu.2022.8. Online ahead of print.PMID: 35249591


The abstract is copied below:

Objective: S100B is a glial cell protein with bimodal function. In low concentrations, it exerts neurotrophic effects, but higher levels reflect neuronal distress. Recent research suggests that this molecule may be a biomarker of response to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). We examined the effect of ECT on serum S100B and its utility as 1) a biomarker of a depressive state and 2) a predictor of ECT response. We also wanted to ensure that ECT does not cause a marked serum S100B-elevation, indicating neural distress.

Methods: We measured serum S100B in 22 in-patients treated with ECT due to depression. Depression severity was assessed using 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17). The data were collected before an ECT series, within one week after the series (post-ECT), and at a six-month follow-up. Changes in serum S100B and clinical outcomes were tested using a linear mixed model. A relationship between serum S100B and the clinical outcomes was examined using Spearman and partial correlation.

Results: Serum S100B did not change significantly immediately after an ECT series or six months later. The post-ECT serum S100B-change was not associated with the clinical effect (rho=.14, n=22, p=.54). The baseline serum S100B did not predict the clinical effect when controlling for age (r =.02, n=22, df=19, p=.92).

Conclusion: The study neither supports serum S100B as a state marker of depression nor a predictor of ECT response. No evidence for ECT-related neural distress was found.

Keywords: S100 calcium-binding protein beta subunit; depression; depressive disorder; electroconvulsive therapy; mood disorders.

The article is here.

And from the text:






This is a carefully conducted study that is an add-on to previously published structural MRI studies in the same cohort of patients. While there is certainly a lot of negativity in the results, some of that negativity is actually very good: "no ECT-related neural distress." The discussion of the S100B protein in the introduction is instructive. I recommend a full read, ~ 15 minutes, to all those interested in biomarker/predictor research in ECT.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

Image
Out on PubMed, from investigators in the US, is this study: Ketamine versus  ECT   for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, Murrough JW, Goes FS, Altinay M, Aloysi AS, Asghar-Ali AA, Barnett BS, Chang LC, Collins KA, Costi S, Iqbal S, Jha MK, Krishnan K, Malone DA, Nikayin S, Nissen SE, Ostroff RB, Reti IM, Wilkinson ST, Wolski K, Hu B. N Engl J Med. 2023 May 24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302399. Online ahead of print. PMID:  37224232 The abstract is copied below: Background:  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain. Methods:  We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression . Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 rat
Read more

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

Image
Out on PubMed, from the team in Augusta, Georgia, is this study: Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST). Youssef NA, McCall WV, Ravilla D, McCloud L, Rosenquist PB. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):E979. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120979. PMID:  33322138 The pdf is here . And from the Introduction : In theory, LAP-ST can be helpful because of the direct effect of lower electric current, but the principal reason is that LAP-ST has a more focal electric field (EF) [ 34 , 35 ]. The current amplitude is the primary factor that drives the EF into brain regions located deeper in the brain and is responsible for cognition and memory such as the hippocampus and temporal lobe [ 33 , 35 ]. This extra focality of the EF can minimize or avoid high EF stimulation to the deeper hippocampal and temporal lobe regions [ 33 , 35 ]. Minimization of deeper stimulation by using LAP
Read more

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT

Image
 Out on PubMed, from authors at Vanderbilt and Mass General,, is this article: Use of   ECT   for Children With and Without Catatonia: A Single-Site Retrospective Analysis. Smith JR, Baldwin I, Termini KA, McGonigle T, Vandekar S, Luccarelli J. J ECT. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000993. Online ahead of print. PMID:  38265759 The abstract is copied below: Objectives: The objective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients. Methods: A single-site retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years who received ECT in a private university hospital from January 28, 2012 to April 8, 2023. Treatment efficacy and adverse events were determined retrospectively through review of the medical record. Results: A total of 36 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Catatonia was the most common presenting indication for ECT, followed by psychosis and suicidal ideation.
Read more