NEJM Review of Transient Global Amnesia: ECT is Dissed

Out on PubMed, in the NEJM, is this review:

Transient Global Amnesia.

Ropper AH.N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 16;388(7):635-640. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2213867.PMID: 36791163 Review. 
The review is here.
And from the text:


In an otherwise reasonable review of TGA, Deputy NEJM editor Allan Ropper takes an unnecessary swipe at ECT. If you look at how a typical patient awakens from ECT compared to how a patient with TGA behaves, there is little comparison. The ECT patient awakens calmly and is reoriented in a few minutes, while the TGA patient is frantic, and the amnesia lasts "a mean of 6 hours."
Not a big deal, you say? Well the NEJM is the most influential medical journal in the world and this review will be read by a huge audience. 
A gratuitous, inaccurate jab at ECT is both uncalled for and damaging to patient welfare. I hope ECT colleagues around the world will consider writing in response, to set the record straight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT