Survey of Opinions ("Ethical Concerns") About "Electroceutical Interventions"

Out on PubMed, from investigators in Michigan and Pennsylvania, is this article:

Stakeholders' Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.

Bluhm R, Sipahi ED, Achtyes ED, McCright AM, Cabrera LY.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023 Jun 21:1-11. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224592. Online ahead of print.PMID: 37343219

The abstract is copied below:

Background: Psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs) use electrical or magnetic stimulation to treat mental disorders and may raise different ethical concerns than other therapies such as medications or talk therapy. Yet little is known about stakeholders' perceptions of, and ethical concerns related to, these interventions. We aimed to better understand the ethical concerns of a variety of stakeholder groups (patients with depression, caregivers of patients, members of the public, and psychiatrists) regarding four PEIs: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and adaptive brain implants (ABI).

Methods: We conducted a national survey of these four stakeholder groups, using an embedded video vignette experiment depicting a patient with treatment-resistant depression and her psychiatrist discussing the possibility of treatment with one of the four PEIs.

Results: Participants' ethical concerns varied by stakeholder group, by PEI, and by the interaction of the two. The three non-clinician groups tended to have similar ethical concerns, but to differ from psychiatrists. Similar concerns were raised with regard to the two implantable technologies, DBS and ABI. Overall, there was relatively little concern about the involuntary use of PEIs, though some expressed concern about the adequacy of information provided during the consent process. There was also significant concern that patients may not receive helpful therapies.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first national survey that includes multiple stakeholder groups and multiple PEI modalities. A better understanding of the ethical concerns of stakeholders can help to shape clinical practice and health care policy regarding PEIs.

Keywords: Ethical concerns; brain stimulation; depression; neuromodulation.

The article is here.
And from the text:




This is a modestly interesting report. The survey data show, unsurprisingly, that the public still has concerns about the safety of ECT.
I cannot, for the life of me, figure out Figure 1. Are the labels missing? And I dislike the term, "electroceutical."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECT plus Antidepressants: a Review

Out on PubMed, from researchers in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, is this review: Influence of an adjuvant antidepressant on the efficacy of  electroconvulsive  therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pluijms EM, Kamperman AM, Hoogendijk WJ, Birkenhäger TK, van den Broek WW. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 8:4867420952543. doi: 10.1177/0004867420952543. Online ahead of print. PMID:  32900217 Here is the "Conclusion" section from the text: Our results suggest that an adjuvant antidepressant enhances the efficacy of ECT in patients with major depression. Although the included studies had some methodological limitations, effect sizes were consistently small to moderate. We speculate that modern-day controlled trials using adequately dosed TCAs and MAOIs will most likely result in larger effect sizes. From a clinical point of view, we prefer an adjuvant TCA to an adjuvant MAOI, since TCAs are generally safe to use with ECT ( American Psychiatric Association, 2001 ; ...
Read more

Clinical Phenotype of Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Reversed by ECT: A Case Report

Image
Out on PubMed, from authors in Germany, is this case report and literature review: Clinical Phenotype of Behavioral-Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Reversed by  ECT : A Case Report. Breitling B, Bartels C, Lange C, Bouter C, Falk HS, Wiltfang J, Zilles-Wegner D, Besse M. Neuropsychobiology. 2024 Dec 2:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000541668. Online ahead of print. PMID:  39622206 The abstract is copied below: Introduction: Diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains difficult even in the presence of core clinical and imaging features. Furthermore, disease-modifying treatments are lacking. Case presentation: Here, we report a case of a patient with clinical and imaging features of FTD. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was used to target affective and catatonic symptoms. After ECT, the patient showed improvements not only in affective symptoms but also in cognitive domains, leading to a marked improvement in the patient's level of functioning. Conclusion: Against the background of di...
Read more

Early Use of the Name "ECT"- Sacklers in 1949

Image
 "Classics in ECT" brings you this study from Creedmore State Hospital in 1949: Nonconvulsive biochemotherapy with histamine and electric convulsive therapy; a comparative study on hospitalized psychotics with a control  ECT  series. SACKLER AM, SACKLER MD, SACKLER RR. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1949 Sep;110(3):185-97. doi: 10.1097/00005053-194911030-00001. PMID:  18138865 The pdf is here . I originally choose this article as the earliest in PubMed to use the name, "ECT," although it also uses "electric [sic] convulsive therapy."  The very first PubMed "ECT" citation is from 1947, but it is written "E.C.T." and also reports a complication, so we prefer this one. Nomenclature aside, this turns out to be an interesting read, with what would now be considered a somewhat bizarre study comparing histamine therapy with ECT. Among the interesting details are the inclusion of a couple of patients with postpartum psychosis and the observation that longer ...
Read more