ECT (Or Not) in Argentina: An Ethics Discussion

Out on PubMed, from authors in Argentina and the US,  is this article:

Neuroethics and cultural context: The case of electroconvulsive therapy in Argentina.
Castelli P, Guinjoan SM, Wajnerman-Paz A, Salles A.Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Jul 12. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12412. Online ahead of print.PMID: 37436004

The article is here.

And from the text:

The stigmatization of ECT is exacerbated by the fact that, except

for a single private institution, Fundación Fleni, the educational

curriculum of resident psychiatrists in Argentina does not include

ECT training. While there are no surveys available measuring

attitudes of psychiatrists and psychologists towards ECT in Argentina,

the common clinical experience is that only an almost

insignificant percentage of mental health professionals prescribe it,

and mental health professionals tend to advise against it.

This is a fascinating, thoughtful and compelling article, a must-read for all ECT healthcare professionals. 
The baggage of ECT's past and the use of unmodified ECT are obviously problems that we in the field still struggle to overcome. The United Nations Convention doesn't help, with its conflation of ECT and torture.
The psychiatric culture in Argentina is idiosyncratic, with an ongoing stranglehold of psychoanalytic theory pushing out biological psychiatry.
The heat of the misguided emotional arguments needs to be replaced with the light of ECT as a straightforward  medical procedure; and yes, practice standards need to be high, as these authors note.

[The only criticism I have is the poor formatting of the references, which makes it very difficult to read and refer to them.]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT