TRD Review in World Psychiatry

Out on PubMed, from a star-studded cast of international experts, is this review:

Treatment-resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions.

McIntyre RS, Alsuwaidan M, Baune BT, Berk M, Demyttenaere K, Goldberg JF, Gorwood P, Ho R, Kasper S, Kennedy SH, Ly-Uson J, Mansur RB, McAllister-Williams RH, Murrough JW, Nemeroff CB, Nierenberg AA, Rosenblat JD, Sanacora G, Schatzberg AF, Shelton R, Stahl SM, Trivedi MH, Vieta E, Vinberg M, Williams N, Young AH, Maj M.World Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;22(3):394-412. doi: 10.1002/wps.21120.PMID: 37713549 
The abstract is copied below:

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common and associated with multiple serious public health implications. A consensus definition of TRD with demonstrated predictive utility in terms of clinical decision-making and health outcomes does not currently exist. Instead, a plethora of definitions have been proposed, which vary significantly in their conceptual framework. The absence of a consensus definition hampers precise estimates of the prevalence of TRD, and also belies efforts to identify risk factors, prevention opportunities, and effective interventions. In addition, it results in heterogeneity in clinical practice decision-making, adversely affecting quality of care. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have adopted the most used definition of TRD (i.e., inadequate response to a minimum of two antidepressants despite adequacy of the treatment trial and adherence to treatment). It is currently estimated that at least 30% of persons with depression meet this definition. A significant percentage of persons with TRD are actually pseudo-resistant (e.g., due to inadequacy of treatment trials or non-adherence to treatment). Although multiple sociodemographic, clinical, treatment and contextual factors are known to negatively moderate response in persons with depression, very few factors are regarded as predictive of non-response across multiple modalities of treatment. Intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine (co-administered with an antidepressant) are established as efficacious in the management of TRD. Some second-generation antipsychotics (e.g., aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, quetiapine XR) are proven effective as adjunctive treatments to antidepressants in partial responders, but only the olanzapine-fluoxetine combination has been studied in FDA-defined TRD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is established as effective and FDA-approved for individuals with TRD, with accelerated theta-burst TMS also recently showing efficacy. Electroconvulsive therapy is regarded as an effective acute and maintenance intervention in TRD, with preliminary evidence suggesting non-inferiority to acute intravenous ketamine. Evidence for extending antidepressant trial, medication switching and combining antidepressants is mixed. Manual-based psychotherapies are not established as efficacious on their own in TRD, but offer significant symptomatic relief when added to conventional antidepressants. Digital therapeutics are under study and represent a potential future clinical vista in this population.

Keywords: Depression; difficult-to-treat depression; electroconvulsive therapy; esketamine; ketamine; neurostimulation; patient-reported outcomes; personalized medicine; precision medicine; second-generation antipsychotics; treatment-resistant depression.
The article is here.
And from the text:
Disappointing that ECT is lumped in with far less proven modalities. ECT really seems like an afterthought for these authors. Oh well, disappointing, but not a bit surprising.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

Image
Out on PubMed, from investigators in the US, is this study: Ketamine versus  ECT   for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, Murrough JW, Goes FS, Altinay M, Aloysi AS, Asghar-Ali AA, Barnett BS, Chang LC, Collins KA, Costi S, Iqbal S, Jha MK, Krishnan K, Malone DA, Nikayin S, Nissen SE, Ostroff RB, Reti IM, Wilkinson ST, Wolski K, Hu B. N Engl J Med. 2023 May 24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302399. Online ahead of print. PMID:  37224232 The abstract is copied below: Background:  Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain. Methods:  We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression . Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 rat
Read more

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

Image
Out on PubMed, from the team in Augusta, Georgia, is this study: Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST). Youssef NA, McCall WV, Ravilla D, McCloud L, Rosenquist PB. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):E979. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120979. PMID:  33322138 The pdf is here . And from the Introduction : In theory, LAP-ST can be helpful because of the direct effect of lower electric current, but the principal reason is that LAP-ST has a more focal electric field (EF) [ 34 , 35 ]. The current amplitude is the primary factor that drives the EF into brain regions located deeper in the brain and is responsible for cognition and memory such as the hippocampus and temporal lobe [ 33 , 35 ]. This extra focality of the EF can minimize or avoid high EF stimulation to the deeper hippocampal and temporal lobe regions [ 33 , 35 ]. Minimization of deeper stimulation by using LAP
Read more

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT

Image
 Out on PubMed, from authors at Vanderbilt and Mass General,, is this article: Use of   ECT   for Children With and Without Catatonia: A Single-Site Retrospective Analysis. Smith JR, Baldwin I, Termini KA, McGonigle T, Vandekar S, Luccarelli J. J ECT. 2024 Jan 25. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000993. Online ahead of print. PMID:  38265759 The abstract is copied below: Objectives: The objective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients. Methods: A single-site retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years who received ECT in a private university hospital from January 28, 2012 to April 8, 2023. Treatment efficacy and adverse events were determined retrospectively through review of the medical record. Results: A total of 36 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Catatonia was the most common presenting indication for ECT, followed by psychosis and suicidal ideation.
Read more