Ketamine vs ECT: Andrade Editorial in Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine

 Here is a new editorial from Chittaranjan Andrade:



The editorial is here.

And here:




This editorial by noted ECT scholar Chittaranjan Andrade is a good critique of the Anand et al. NEJM trial comparing ECT and IV ketamine.

I completely agree with his penultimate sentence (highlighted above). I do think his last sentence (also highlighted above), about the justification of a ketamine trial before ECT, should be qualified, noting that clinical judgment needs to be applied and that ketamine may not be appropriate for urgently ill patients.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT