Swedish Researchers Reply to Pridmore in JECT LTE

 Out on PubMed, from researchers in Sweden, in JECT, is this responsive LTE:

Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With a Depressive Episode: A Register-Based Study.

Popiolek K, Arnison T, Boden R, Ekman CJ, Lundberg J, Strandberg P, Nordenskjöld A.

J ECT. 2024 Mar 6. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001005. Online ahead of print.

PMID: 38456234



The letter is here.

And here:

Here is the response of the Swedish researcher team to Pridmore's methodological critique. (Please see yesterday's blog post.) They did the requested re-analysis of the data, and confirmed the original superiority of ECT.

There has never been a shortage of people in our field who jump at every opportunity to demean ECT and prematurely tout other treatments as replacements. But the clinical reality remains that ECT is the "gold standard."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT