Classics in ECT: The Gabors in World J Psychiatry 2019

"Classics in ECT" brings you this review by Hungarian ECT experts:


Electroconvulsive therapy: 80 years old and still going strong.

Gazdag G, Ungvari GS.World J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):1-6. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v9.i1.1. eCollection 2019 Jan 4.PMID: 30631748 



The abstract is here:

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), which is among the oldest and most controversial treatments in the field of psychiatry, has its 80th birthday this year. In this brief historical overview, the discovery of the therapeutic effects of convulsive therapy by Laszló Meduna, and the circumstances that motivated Ugo Cerletti and Lucio Bini to use electricity as a means of seizure induction are described. Meduna's original theory about the antagonism between epilepsy and schizophrenia has been replaced by hypotheses on the mechanism of action of ECT. The position of ECT in modern psychiatry is also discussed with special attention to its most important clinical indications, including catatonia, and pre- and postpartum affective and psychotic states that are responsive to ECT and in which ECT may even be lifesaving. Adverse effects and comparison of ECT with recently developed brain stimulation methods are also reviewed. The negative media portrayal of ECT and its earlier misuse may have contributed to its negative professional and public perceptions indicated repeatedly in attitude surveys. This negative attitude has played an important role in the decreasing use of ECT in the developed world and a reduction in access to ECT, which constitutes a violation of psychiatric patients' right to an effective treatment.

The review is here.
And from the text:



Here is an oft-cited brief review of ECT from 2019 by the two Gabors, both ECT scholars.
It reads well, is new enough to mention neuroplasticity as a possible mechanism, and has the nice touch about limited access being a violation of patients' rights. The latter point is an excellent rebuke to the WHO/United Nations Mental health, human rights and legislation: Guidance and practice document, which is tainted by anti-ECT disinformation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ECT vs Ketamine: NEJM Article Sets Up False Equivalency

RUL ECT vs Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

ECT For Children at a University Hospital: New Study in JECT