Optimizing ECT With E-Field Modeling: A Narrative Review in JECT
Out on PubMed, from authors in China and the US, is this article:
Optimizing Electroconvulsive Therapy With E-Field Modeling: A Narrative Review.
J ECT. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001111. Online ahead of print.PMID: 39853304
The abstract is copied below:
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for severe depression, especially in treatment-resistant cases. However, its potential cognitive side effects necessitate careful dosing to balance therapeutic benefits and cognitive stability. Recent advances in electric field (E-field) modeling offer promising avenues to optimize ECT dosing. This review synthesizes current knowledge on E-field modeling in ECT and explores its clinical applications. It examines the variability in E-field strengths and distributions induced by ECT and their impact on clinical outcomes. Additionally, the relationship between E-field strengths, neuroplasticity, and therapeutic efficacy is discussed. Translational studies of E-field-informed ECT are highlighted, emphasizing individualized optimal amplitude dosing and potential clinical applications. This review provides useful insights into how E-field modeling can improve the effectiveness of ECT while minimizing adverse effects, helping guide future research and clinical practice.The article is here.
And from the text:
If you are a fan of E-field modeling to guide stimulus dosing in ECT, then this article is for you. It is a fine review of this theory-based idea, summarizing the current literature, scant though it may be. I do fault the authors a bit for elevating the issue of temporary cognitive effects to such a high level, which, in the wrong hands, can be used as an argument against ECT. I also wish that they would use the term "cognitive tolerability" rather than "cognitive safety."
Comments
Post a Comment